Governments and businesses everywhere are undergoing a massive transition to a world with reduced reliance on fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions. Many industries and businesses will be transformed in years to come, including oil and gas companies, electric utilities and car manufacturers. We are already witnessing the changes as we see more electric vehicles on the road, rapid growth in renewable energy generation and market-altering climate policies at the global, national, state and local level. Ultimately, every business will be significantly affected by the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Thousands of companies now embrace this fact and publicize their strategies to adapt and stay competitive in a net-zero economy. According to CDP, the global non-profit that runs the world’s environmental disclosure system, in 2022 more than 4,000 companies disclosed that they had a climate transition plan. However, there is a wide range in the quality of disclosures and most companies fall short on a crucial element: they do not adequately describe the impact of transition activities on workers, customers, contractors, communities and other key stakeholders. Put another way, they do not demonstrate if and how they will pursue a just transition, which refers to the process of decarbonizing the economy in a way that is fair, equitable and inclusive, and that accounts for the socioeconomic impacts of transition activities on workers, communities and other stakeholder groups.
This omission forces one to question the underlying credibility of many corporate climate transition plans, as stakeholder cooperation is integral to strategy execution and risk management. As demonstrated in various examples, failure to account for the potential negative impacts on workers and communities can create backlash, disruptions and costly consequences for companies undergoing transition. For example, when Entergy Corporation announced the closing of two coal plants in Arkansas in November 2018, the Arkansas Attorney General petitioned a federal court to intervene and halt the plans, which were not approved by a U.S. district judge until March 2021. (See “Judge approves Entergy Arkansas, Sierra Club agreement to retire coal, natural gas power plants.” The box below notes a couple of other examples.)
There is clearly a big difference between making a pledge to reduce emissions and implementing the changes needed to fulfill those pledges. Whether it’s a power company retiring a coal plant or a car manufacturer converting to electric vehicle production, to execute transition plans effectively, it is vital that companies anticipate challenges to implementation and recognize the impacts on a wide range of stakeholders, including workers and communities.
Institutional investors with trillions of assets emphasize that this area has not been given sufficient attention, and beyond urging companies to publicly acknowledge the impacts, are calling on companies to:
A Statement of Investor Commitment to Support a Just Transition on Climate Change has been signed by 161 investors.
At the core of this call to action is an emphasis on the financial implications, as investors may be exposed to increased financial risks if portfolio companies fail to manage materially important operational, legal, regulatory and reputational challenges.
At Segal Marco, we believe that any climate transition plan should also account for the impact on workers, communities and other key stakeholders. Further, we believe companies that develop a process to include stakeholders in transition-planning activities will be more successful by building effective long-term relationships with workers, customers, contractors, suppliers, government agencies and local community leaders. Businesses depend on these groups to run profitably and smoothly and create sustainable returns for shareholders.
As companies transform their operations to thrive in a low-carbon economy, they have a vested interest in being transparent about their objectives, bringing stakeholders to the table to help develop transition plans and leveraging those conversations and relationships to gain a competitive edge. Moreover, developing a robust, inclusive, well-structured just transition strategy is an opportunity that companies can seize to stand above their peers, strengthen their stakeholder partnerships and increase their long-term resilience.
Additional Examples of Failure to Account for Potential Negative Impacts of Climate Transition Plans
Richmond, CA is among municipalities in the state that have sued fossil fuel companies and requested money for climate transition. That decision has implications because Chevron, which operates a refinery there, is the largest employer in the city and pays taxes and fees that account for at least 10 percent of the city’s budget. (To learn more, read “Richmond v Chevron: the California city taking on its most powerful polluter.”)
By 2030, Xcel Energy will close its coal plant, Sherburne County Generating Station, in Becker, MN, which has 301 workers and represents more than three-quarters of the city’s tax base. The replacement gas plant will have about 90 percent fewer workers. (For more information, read “Coal Plant Communities Seek a Just Economic Transition.”)
The information and opinions herein provided by third parties have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. This article and the data and analysis herein is intended for general education only and not as investment advice. It is not intended for use as a basis for investment decisions, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the needs of any particular investor. On all matters involving legal interpretations and regulatory issues, investors should consult legal counsel.
Don't miss out. Join 16,000 others who already get the latest insights from Segal and Segal Marco Advisors.